All docs

Docs

AI Review Checklist

Run this quality gate before handing work to the user. Use it with operational-manifesto.md, workflow-contracts.md, and workflow-test-plan.md.

1. Outcome Audit

  • Is the outcome type named?
  • Is the reuse decision clear: reuse existing, extend existing, create new, or assemble only?
  • Are all changed files inside the allowed package, gallery, route, token, docs, or rule boundaries?
  • Are required injection points complete: package export, route shell, libraryNav.ts, personalLoanFlow.ts, Code Connect, or token generated artifacts?
  • Did the user approve new components, new tokens, route structure, or ambiguous UX states when required?

2. Visual And UX Audit

  • For AppFlow work, is the layout constrained to the established centered flow pattern?
  • For static pages, does the layout follow the informational gallery pattern instead of AppFlow chrome?
  • Are spacing, radius, typography, shadows, and colors mapped to Spring DS tokens?
  • Are loading, empty, error, disabled, focus, hover, success, and validation states handled when relevant?
  • Does copy support the user goal with a helpful, trustworthy, and direct tone?

3. Technical Audit

  • Is the implementation Next.js App Router, React, TypeScript, and Tailwind CSS?
  • Are reusable UI imports coming from @spring/ds-react?
  • Are route shells thin and gallery implementations kept under apps/design-library/src/gallery/?
  • Are Server Components used by default, with 'use client' only for hooks, events, lifecycle, or browser APIs?
  • Are there no raw hex values, arbitrary spacing strings, or generic non-system style tokens?
  • Are production APIs, analytics, database access, and business integrations kept out of gallery and AppFlow preview screens?

4. Validation Audit

  • Was npm run tokens:sync run when token source changed?
  • If token source changed, was the dev server restarted or stale preview risk disclosed?
  • If token source changed before production build validation, was apps/design-library/.next cleared?
  • Was npm run code-connect:parse run when *.figma.tsx changed?
  • Was npm run lint run for component or code changes when practical?
  • Was npm run build run for route, gallery, package, or AppFlow changes when practical?
  • Are skipped validations listed with a reason?

5. Handoff Audit

  • Does the final response list the outcome and files changed?
  • Does it include or reconstruct WorkflowRunState when work may continue later?
  • If this continues a prior session, was prior approval visible or re-confirmed?
  • Does it provide the /library/* route or import path when applicable?
  • Does it summarize registry, export, nav, route, Code Connect, or token injection?
  • Does it disclose dirty-tree caveats or pre-existing unrelated changes that affect confidence?
  • Does it name remaining risks without overstating success?